Radeon Graphics 448SP Mobile vs Quadro T1000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking323not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency23.01no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameTU117Barcelo
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date27 May 2019 (5 years ago)6 January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data448
Core clock speed1395 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1455 MHz1800 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million10,700 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rateno data50.40
Floating-point processing powerno data1.613 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speed8000 MHzSystem Shared
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.0 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.7 (6.4)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCLno data2.1
Vulkan-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 May 2019 6 January 2022
Chip lithography 12 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 45 Watt

Graphics 448SP Mobile has an age advantage of 2 years, a 71.4% more advanced lithography process, and 11.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro T1000 and Radeon Graphics 448SP Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro T1000 is a workstation card while Radeon Graphics 448SP Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro T1000
Quadro T1000
AMD Radeon Graphics 448SP Mobile
Radeon Graphics 448SP Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 391 vote

Rate Quadro T1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 37 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 448SP Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.