Tesla PG503-216 vs Quadro RTX 8200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)Volta (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGA102GV100
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release dateno data26 November 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores75524608
Core clock speedno data1312 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHz1530 MHz
Number of transistors40,000 million21,100 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)260 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate708.0440.6
Floating-point processing power22.66 TFLOPS14.1 TFLOPS
ROPs96128
TMUs472288
Tensor Coresno data640

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6HBM2
Maximum RAM amount48 GB32 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHz1106 MHz
Memory bandwidth672.0 GB/s1.13 TB/s
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-CNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-7.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 48 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 260 Watt 250 Watt

RTX 8200 has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 71.4% more advanced lithography process.

Tesla PG503-216, on the other hand, has 4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro RTX 8200 and Tesla PG503-216. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8200
Quadro RTX 8200
NVIDIA Tesla PG503-216
Tesla PG503-216

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 15 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 8200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.3 3 votes

Rate Tesla PG503-216 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro RTX 8200 or Tesla PG503-216, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.