Radeon RX 6550M vs Quadro RTX 8200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated267
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data22.24
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGA102Navi 24
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release dateno data4 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores75521024
Core clock speedno data2000 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHz2840 MHz
Number of transistors40,000 million5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)260 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate708.0181.8
Floating-point processing power22.66 TFLOPS5.816 TFLOPS
ROPs9632
TMUs47264
Ray Tracing Coresno data16
L0 Cacheno data256 KB
L1 Cacheno data256 KB
L2 Cacheno data1024 KB
L3 Cacheno data16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x4
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount48 GB4 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth672.0 GB/s144.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-CPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCLno data2.2
Vulkan-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 48 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 260 Watt 80 Watt

RTX 8200 has a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RX 6550M, on the other hand, has a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 225% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro RTX 8200 and Radeon RX 6550M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 8200 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 6550M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8200
Quadro RTX 8200
AMD Radeon RX 6550M
Radeon RX 6550M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 15 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 8200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 377 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6550M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro RTX 8200 or Radeon RX 6550M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.