Radeon R3 Mobile Graphics vs Quadro RTX 8000

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking	54	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	9.77	no data
Architecture	Turing (2018−2021)	GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code name	TU102	Beema
Market segment	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	13 August 2018 (5 years ago)	28 January 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$9,999	no data
Current price	$3230 (0.3x MSRP)	$380

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	4608	128
Core clock speed	1395 MHz	600 MHz
Boost clock speed	1770 MHz	655 MHz
Number of transistors	18,600 million	930 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	260 Watt	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	509.8	4.800

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro RTX 8000 and Radeon R3 Mobile Graphics compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	IGP
Length	267 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	48 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	384 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	672.0 GB/s	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_1)	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	6.5	6.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	2.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA	7.5	no data

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	13 August 2018	28 January 2015
Maximum RAM amount	48 GB	System Shared
Chip lithography	12 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	260 Watt	15 Watt

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---