Radeon AI PRO R9700 vs Quadro RTX 8000 Passive

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)RDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameTU102Navi 48
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date13 August 2018 (6 years ago)July 2025
Launch price (MSRP)$9,999 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores46084096
Core clock speed1230 MHz1660 MHz
Boost clock speed1620 MHz2920 MHz
Number of transistors18,600 million53,900 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)260 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate466.6747.5
Floating-point processing power14.93 TFLOPS47.84 TFLOPS
ROPs96128
TMUs288256
Tensor Cores576128
Ray Tracing Cores7264

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount48 GB32 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2518 MHz
Memory bandwidth672.0 GB/s644.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C4x DisplayPort 2.1a

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.5-
DLSS++

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 48 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 260 Watt 300 Watt

RTX 8000 Passive has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 15.4% lower power consumption.

AI PRO R9700, on the other hand, has a 200% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro RTX 8000 Passive and Radeon AI PRO R9700. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive
Quadro RTX 8000 Passive
AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700
Radeon AI PRO R9700

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 21 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 8000 Passive on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon AI PRO R9700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro RTX 8000 Passive or Radeon AI PRO R9700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.