Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) vs Quadro RTX 6000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
CMP 50HX GRID RTX T10-2 GRID RTX T10-8 GRID RTX T10-16 6000 6000 Passive 8000 8000 Passive Tesla T10 Tesla T10 16 GB Tesla T10 24 GB Tesla T40 24 GB
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
2 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU 2-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) 3-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU 4-Core iGPU (Arc) 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro RTX 6000 with Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc), including specs and performance data.

RTX 6000
2018, $6,299
24 GB GDDR6, 260 Watt
42.66
+352%

RTX 6000 outperforms Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) by a whopping 352% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
RTX 6000 RTX 6000
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking102500
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.24no data
Power efficiency12.61no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Xe LPG (2023−2025)
GPU code nameTU102Meteor Lake iGPU
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date13 August 2018 (7 years ago)14 December 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$6,299 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores46084
Core clock speed1440 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1770 MHz1950 MHz
Number of transistors18,600 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)260 Wattno data
Texture fill rate509.8no data
Floating-point processing power16.31 TFLOPSno data
ROPs96no data
TMUs288no data
Tensor Cores576no data
Ray Tracing Cores72no data
L1 Cache4.5 MB768 KB
L2 Cache6 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount24 GBno data
Memory bus width384 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1750 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth672.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-Cno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)no data
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA7.5-
DLSS+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD90−95
+350%
20
−350%

Cost per frame, $

1080p69.99no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Far Cry 5 24
+0%
24
+0%
Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Far Cry 5 22
+0%
22
+0%
Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 15
+0%
15
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30
+0%
30
+0%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Far Cry 5 21
+0%
21
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16
+0%
16
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Valorant 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

This is how RTX 6000 and Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) compete in popular games:

  • RTX 6000 is 350% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 60 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 42.66 9.43
Recency 13 August 2018 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm

RTX 6000 has a 352.4% higher aggregate performance score.

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 140% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro RTX 6000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 6000 is a workstation graphics card while Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
Quadro RTX 6000
Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RTX 6000 Quadro RTX 6000
vs
Pro W6900X Radeon Pro W6900X
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) Graphics 4 Core iGPU (Arc)
vs
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) Graphics 4 Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
RTX 6000 Quadro RTX 6000
vs
RTX 2000 Ada Generation RTX 2000 Ada Generation
RTX 6000 Quadro RTX 6000
vs
Jetson Nano Jetson Nano
RTX 6000 Quadro RTX 6000
vs
HD Graphics 12EU Mobile HD Graphics 12EU Mobile
RTX 6000 Quadro RTX 6000
vs
HD 6970M X2 Radeon HD 6970M X2
RTX 6000 Quadro RTX 6000
vs
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
RTX 6000 Quadro RTX 6000
vs
Apple M4 Max 32-Core GPU M4 Max 32-Core GPU
RTX 6000 Quadro RTX 6000
vs
Instinct MI350X Radeon Instinct MI350X
RTX 6000 Quadro RTX 6000
vs
Go 7950 GTX MXM-IV GeForce Go 7950 GTX MXM-IV
RTX 6000 Quadro RTX 6000
vs
Graphics 3-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) Graphics 3 Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
RTX 6000 Quadro RTX 6000
vs
Graphics 2 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU Graphics 2 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU
R9 A375 Radeon R9 A375
vs
RTX 8000 Quadro RTX 8000

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 144 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro RTX 6000 or Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.