Radeon RX 5950 vs Quadro RTX 6000 Passive

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameTU102Navi 21
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date13 August 2018 (7 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$6,299 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores46084864
Core clock speed1275 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1620 MHz1535 MHz
Number of transistors18,600 million21,000 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)260 Watt350 Watt
Texture fill rate466.6466.6
Floating-point processing power14.93 TFLOPS14.93 TFLOPS
ROPs9696
TMUs288304
Tensor Cores576no data
Ray Tracing Cores72no data
L1 Cache4.5 MBno data
L2 Cache6 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount24 GB24 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1625 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth624.0 GB/s672.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12.0 (12_1)
Shader Model6.8no data
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.3-
CUDA7.5-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 12 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 260 Watt 350 Watt

RTX 6000 Passive has 34.6% lower power consumption.

RX 5950, on the other hand, has a 71.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro RTX 6000 Passive and Radeon RX 5950. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 6000 Passive is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 5950 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive
Quadro RTX 6000 Passive
AMD Radeon RX 5950
Radeon RX 5950

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.9 9 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 6000 Passive on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 9 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro RTX 6000 Passive or Radeon RX 5950, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.