Radeon Graphics 448SP vs Quadro RTX 6000 Passive

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameTU102Renoir
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date13 August 2018 (7 years ago)6 January 2020 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$6,299 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4608448
Core clock speed1275 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1620 MHz1900 MHz
Number of transistors18,600 million9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)260 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate466.653.20
Floating-point processing power14.93 TFLOPS1.702 TFLOPS
ROPs968
TMUs28828
Tensor Cores576no data
Ray Tracing Cores72no data
L1 Cache4.5 MBno data
L2 Cache6 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount24 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width384 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1625 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth624.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsMotherboard Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.86.7 (6.4)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA7.5-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 August 2018 6 January 2020
Chip lithography 12 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 260 Watt 15 Watt

Graphics 448SP has an age advantage of 1 year, a 71.4% more advanced lithography process, and 1633.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro RTX 6000 Passive and Radeon Graphics 448SP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 6000 Passive is a workstation graphics card while Radeon Graphics 448SP is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive
Quadro RTX 6000 Passive
AMD Radeon Graphics 448SP
Radeon Graphics 448SP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.9 9 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 6000 Passive on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 87 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 448SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro RTX 6000 Passive or Radeon Graphics 448SP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.