Radeon Pro W6300M vs Quadro RTX 5000
Primary Details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 87 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation | 17.65 | no data |
| Architecture | Turing (2018−2021) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2022) |
| GPU code name | TU104 | Navi 24 |
| Market segment | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 13 August 2018 (5 years ago) | 19 January 2022 (2 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,299 | no data |
| Current price | $1540 (0.7x MSRP) | no data |
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed Specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 3072 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 1620 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz | 2040 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 13,600 million | 5,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 230 Watt | 25 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 348.5 | 97.92 |
Form Factor & Compatibility
Information on Quadro RTX 5000 and Radeon Pro W6300M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Length | 267 mm | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 32 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 16 GB/s |
| Memory bandwidth | 448.0 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
Connectivity and Outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | No outputs |
API Compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.6 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.3 |
| CUDA | 7.5 | no data |
Pros & Cons Summary
| Recency | 13 August 2018 | 19 January 2022 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 2 GB |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 230 Watt | 25 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Quadro RTX 5000 and Radeon Pro W6300M. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Quadro RTX 5000 is a workstation card while Radeon Pro W6300M is a mobile workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with Similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
