Radeon Pro WX 8200 vs Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

Place in performance ranking	111	126
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Value for money	8.01	10.08
Architecture	Turing (2018−2021)	GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code name	N19E-Q5	Vega 10
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Release date	27 May 2019 (4 years ago)	13 August 2018 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$999
Current price	$3065	$2172 (2.2x MSRP)

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Pro WX 8200 has 26% better value for money than RTX 5000 Mobile.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3072	3584
Core clock speed	1035 / 1350 MHz	1200 MHz
Boost clock speed	1545 / 1770 MHz	1500 MHz
Number of transistors	13,600 million	12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	110 / 150 Watt	230 Watt
Texture fill rate	296.6	336.0

Size and compatibility

Information on Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile and Radeon Pro WX 8200 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	HBM2
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	2048 Bit
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	448.0 GB/s	512.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	4x mini-DisplayPort
G-SYNC support	+	no data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.5	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.1.125
CUDA	7.5	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 5000 Mobile 38.31
+6.5%

Pro WX 8200 35.98

Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile outperforms Radeon Pro WX 8200 by 6% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RTX 5000 Mobile 14832
+6.5%

Pro WX 8200 13931

Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile outperforms Radeon Pro WX 8200 by 6% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	132 +10%	120−130 −10%
1440p	84 +12%	75−80 −12%
4K	54 +8%	50−55 −8%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

65−70
+11.7%

60−65

−11.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	104 +9.5%	95−100 −9.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	65−70 +11.7%	60−65 −11.7%
Battlefield 5	165 +10%	150−160 −10%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	156 +11.4%	140−150 −11.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	65−70 +11.7%	60−65 −11.7%
Far Cry 5	128 +6.7%	120−130 −6.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	90−95 +8.2%	85−90 −8.2%
Forza Horizon 4	110−120 +7.3%	110−120 −7.3%
Hitman 3	120−130 +10.9%	110−120 −10.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	80−85 +10.7%	75−80 −10.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	126 +14.5%	110−120 −14.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	104 +9.5%	95−100 −9.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	70−75 +9.2%	65−70 −9.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	94 +10.6%	85−90 −10.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	65−70 +11.7%	60−65 −11.7%
Battlefield 5	162 +8%	150−160 −8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	132 +10%	120−130 −10%
Cyberpunk 2077	65−70 +11.7%	60−65 −11.7%
Far Cry 5	123 +11.8%	110−120 −11.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	90−95 +8.2%	85−90 −8.2%
Forza Horizon 4	110−120 +7.3%	110−120 −7.3%
Hitman 3	120−130 +10.9%	110−120 −10.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	80−85 +10.7%	75−80 −10.7%
Metro Exodus	99 +10%	90−95 −10%
Red Dead Redemption 2	71 +9.2%	65−70 −9.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	99 +10%	90−95 −10%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	181 +13.1%	160−170 −13.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	70−75 +9.2%	65−70 −9.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	73 +12.3%	65−70 −12.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	65−70 +11.7%	60−65 −11.7%
Battlefield 5	152 +8.6%	140−150 −8.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	65−70 +11.7%	60−65 −11.7%
Far Cry 5	115 +15%	100−105 −15%
Far Cry New Dawn	90−95 +8.2%	85−90 −8.2%
Forza Horizon 4	110−120 +7.3%	110−120 −7.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	100 +11.1%	90−95 −11.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	70−75 +9.2%	65−70 −9.2%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	87 +8.8%	80−85 −8.8%
Hitman 3	70−75 +9.2%	65−70 −9.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 +8%	50−55 −8%
Metro Exodus	59 +7.3%	55−60 −7.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	44 +10%	40−45 −10%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	87 +8.8%	80−85 −8.8%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	63 +14.5%	55−60 −14.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 +20%	35−40 −20%
Battlefield 5	124 +12.7%	110−120 −12.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−33 +11.1%	27−30 −11.1%
Far Cry 5	102 +7.4%	95−100 −7.4%
Far Cry New Dawn	70−75 +10.8%	65−70 −10.8%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 +8%	75−80 −8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	55−60 +10%	50−55 −10%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 +13.3%	30−33 −13.3%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	49 +8.9%	45−50 −8.9%
Hitman 3	35−40 +8.6%	35−40 −8.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 +7.4%	27−30 −7.4%
Metro Exodus	37 +23.3%	30−33 −23.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	28 +16.7%	24−27 −16.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	47 +17.5%	40−45 −17.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	71 +9.2%	65−70 −9.2%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40 +14.3%	35−40 −14.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24−27 +14.3%	21−24 −14.3%
Battlefield 5	73 +12.3%	65−70 −12.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 +8.3%	12−14 −8.3%
Far Cry 5	56 +12%	50−55 −12%
Far Cry New Dawn	40−45 +14.3%	35−40 −14.3%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 +8%	50−55 −8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	20−22 +11.1%	18−20 −11.1%

This is how RTX 5000 Mobile and Pro WX 8200 compete in popular games:

RTX 5000 Mobile is 10% faster than Pro WX 8200 in 1080p
RTX 5000 Mobile is 12% faster than Pro WX 8200 in 1440p
RTX 5000 Mobile is 8% faster than Pro WX 8200 in 4K

Advantages and disadvantages

Performance score	38.31	35.98
Recency	27 May 2019	13 August 2018
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	110 Watt	230 Watt