Radeon Pro WX 7100 vs Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

#ad 
Buy
Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q Quadro RTX 5000 X2 Mobile
VS
#ad 
Buy
Radeon Instinct MI6 Radeon Pro Duo Polaris Radeon Pro V7300X Radeon Pro V7350X2 Radeon Pro WX 5100 Radeon Pro WX 7100

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile with Radeon Pro WX 7100, including specs and performance data.

RTX 5000 Mobile
2019
16 GB GDDR6, 110 Watt
31.06
+77.8%

RTX 5000 Mobile outperforms Pro WX 7100 by an impressive 78% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

RTX 5000 Mobile RTX 5000
Pro WX 7100 Pro WX 7100

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking146286
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data7.95
Power efficiency22.3810.65
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameTU104Ellesmere
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date27 May 2019 (5 years ago)10 November 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores30722304
Core clock speed1035 MHz1188 MHz
Boost clock speed1545 MHz1243 MHz
Number of transistors13,600 million5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)110 Watt130 Watt
Texture fill rate296.6179.0
Floating-point processing power9.492 TFLOPS5.728 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs192144
Tensor Cores384no data
Ray Tracing Cores48no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount16 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync-+
VR Ready+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.56.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA7.5-
DLSS+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD132
+88.6%
70−75
−88.6%
1440p84
+86.7%
45−50
−86.7%
4K54
+80%
30−35
−80%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data11.41
1440pno data17.76
4Kno data26.63

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 95−100
+96%
50−55
−96%
Counter-Strike 2 190−200
+76.1%
100−110
−76.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+90%
40−45
−90%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 95−100
+96%
50−55
−96%
Battlefield 5 165
+109%
75−80
−109%
Counter-Strike 2 190−200
+76.1%
100−110
−76.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+90%
40−45
−90%
Far Cry 5 128
+100%
60−65
−100%
Fortnite 150−160
+48.5%
100−110
−48.5%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+66.7%
75−80
−66.7%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110
+72.1%
60−65
−72.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+86.1%
70−75
−86.1%
Valorant 200−210
+43.4%
140−150
−43.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 95−100
+96%
50−55
−96%
Battlefield 5 162
+105%
75−80
−105%
Counter-Strike 2 190−200
+76.1%
100−110
−76.1%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+20.4%
230−240
−20.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+90%
40−45
−90%
Dota 2 98
−10.2%
100−110
+10.2%
Far Cry 5 123
+92.2%
60−65
−92.2%
Fortnite 150−160
+48.5%
100−110
−48.5%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+66.7%
75−80
−66.7%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110
+72.1%
60−65
−72.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 110−120
+62%
70−75
−62%
Metro Exodus 99
+141%
40−45
−141%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+86.1%
70−75
−86.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 181
+235%
50−55
−235%
Valorant 200−210
+43.4%
140−150
−43.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 152
+92.4%
75−80
−92.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+90%
40−45
−90%
Dota 2 92
−17.4%
100−110
+17.4%
Far Cry 5 115
+79.7%
60−65
−79.7%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+66.7%
75−80
−66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+86.1%
70−75
−86.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100
+85.2%
50−55
−85.2%
Valorant 181
+26.6%
140−150
−26.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 150−160
+48.5%
100−110
−48.5%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+108%
40−45
−108%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 230−240
+68.6%
130−140
−68.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70
+100%
30−35
−100%
Metro Exodus 59
+136%
24−27
−136%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+2.9%
170−180
−2.9%
Valorant 240−250
+34.1%
170−180
−34.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 124
+130%
50−55
−130%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+106%
18−20
−106%
Far Cry 5 102
+137%
40−45
−137%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+93.8%
45−50
−93.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+96.8%
30−35
−96.8%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 85−90
+95.5%
40−45
−95.5%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 27−30
+80%
14−16
−80%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+124%
16−18
−124%
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70
+97.1%
35−40
−97.1%
Metro Exodus 37
+147%
14−16
−147%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 71
+154%
27−30
−154%
Valorant 200−210
+88%
100−110
−88%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 73
+152%
27−30
−152%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+124%
16−18
−124%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+113%
8−9
−113%
Dota 2 100−105
+53.8%
65−70
−53.8%
Far Cry 5 56
+167%
21−24
−167%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+84.8%
30−35
−84.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+121%
18−20
−121%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 40−45
+116%
18−20
−116%

This is how RTX 5000 Mobile and Pro WX 7100 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5000 Mobile is 89% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 5000 Mobile is 87% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 5000 Mobile is 80% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 5000 Mobile is 235% faster.
  • in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro WX 7100 is 17% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 5000 Mobile is ahead in 61 test (97%)
  • Pro WX 7100 is ahead in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 31.06 17.47
Recency 27 May 2019 10 November 2016
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 110 Watt 130 Watt

RTX 5000 Mobile has a 77.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 18.2% lower power consumption.

The Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro WX 7100 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while Radeon Pro WX 7100 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
Quadro RTX 5000
AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100
Radeon Pro WX 7100
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RTX 5000 Mobile Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
vs
Pro Vega 64X Radeon Pro Vega 64X
Pro WX 7100 Radeon Pro WX 7100
vs
FirePro W9100 FirePro W9100
RTX 5000 Mobile Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
vs
RTX 4000 Mobile Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
M2000M Quadro M2000M
vs
RTX 5000 Mobile RTX 5000 Mobile
Quadro P5000 Quadro P5000
vs
RTX 5000 Mobile RTX 5000 Mobile
Quadro P4000 Quadro P4000
vs
RTX 5000 Mobile RTX 5000 Mobile
GTX 1080 GeForce GTX 1080
vs
RTX 5000 Mobile RTX 5000 Mobile
Quadro M1200 Quadro M1200
vs
RTX 5000 Mobile RTX 5000 Mobile
RX 580 Radeon RX 580
vs
RTX 5000 Mobile RTX 5000 Mobile
GTX 1060 6 GB GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
vs
RTX 5000 Mobile RTX 5000 Mobile
GTX TITAN X GeForce GTX TITAN X
vs
RTX 5000 Mobile RTX 5000 Mobile
Quadro P1000 Quadro P1000
vs
RTX 5000 Mobile RTX 5000 Mobile
Tesla P40 Tesla P40
vs
RTX 5000 Mobile RTX 5000 Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.3 42 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 58 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 7100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile or Radeon Pro WX 7100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.