Radeon Pro Vega 64X vs Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated138
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data9.84
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameTU104BVega 10
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date8 June 2020 (4 years ago)19 March 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores30724096
Core clock speed1035 MHz1250 MHz
Boost clock speed1545 MHz1468 MHz
Number of transistors13,600 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)110 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate296.6375.8
Floating-point processing power9.492 TFLOPS12.03 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs192256
Tensor Cores384no data
Ray Tracing Cores48no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6HBM2
Maximum RAM amount16 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s512.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1401.1.125
CUDA7.5-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 June 2020 19 March 2019
Chip lithography 12 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 110 Watt 250 Watt

RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh has an age advantage of 1 year, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 127.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh and Radeon Pro Vega 64X. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X
Radeon Pro Vega 64X

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 33 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 64X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.