GMA X4500MHD vs Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Generation 5.0 (2008)
GPU code nameTU104BCantiga
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date8 June 2020 (5 years ago)1 September 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores307280
Core clock speed1035 MHz533 MHz
Boost clock speed1545 MHzno data
Number of transistors13,600 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)110 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rate296.65.330
Floating-point processing power9.492 TFLOPS0.08528 TFLOPS
ROPs641
TMUs19210
Tensor Cores384no data
Ray Tracing Cores48no data
L1 Cache3 MBno data
L2 Cache4 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount16 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1750 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)10.0
Shader Model6.54.0
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.140N/A
CUDA7.5-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 June 2020 1 September 2008
Chip lithography 12 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 110 Watt 13 Watt

RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh has an age advantage of 11 years, and a 441.7% more advanced lithography process.

GMA X4500MHD, on the other hand, has 746.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh and GMA X4500MHD. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh is a mobile workstation graphics card while GMA X4500MHD is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh
Intel GMA X4500MHD
GMA X4500MHD

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 17 votes

Rate GMA X4500MHD on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh or GMA X4500MHD, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.