ATI FireGL V7350 vs Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)R500 (2005−2007)
GPU code nameTU104BR520
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date8 June 2020 (5 years ago)1 October 2005 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,599

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3072no data
Core clock speed1035 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speed1545 MHzno data
Number of transistors13,600 million321 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)110 Watt111 Watt
Texture fill rate296.69.600
Floating-point processing power9.492 TFLOPSno data
ROPs6416
TMUs19216
Tensor Cores384no data
Ray Tracing Cores48no data
L1 Cache3 MBno data
L2 Cache4 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount16 GB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz650 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s41.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model6.53.0
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.140N/A
CUDA7.5-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 June 2020 1 October 2005
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 110 Watt 111 Watt

RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh has an age advantage of 14 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 650% more advanced lithography process, and 0.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh and FireGL V7350. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh is a mobile workstation graphics card while FireGL V7350 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh
ATI FireGL V7350
FireGL V7350

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 6 votes

Rate FireGL V7350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh or FireGL V7350, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.