NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 vs Matrox Condor
Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, release date and other general parameters.
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results.
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on Quadro RTX 4000 and Matrox Condor compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on Quadro RTX 4000 and Matrox Condor. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference video cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model.
APIs supported by Quadro RTX 4000 and Matrox Condor, sometimes including their particular versions.
Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
Finer manufacturing process technology (12 vs 180 nm)
Advantages of Matrox Condor
We are unaware of any advantages of Matrox Condor over NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000.
So, Quadro RTX 4000 or Matrox Condor?
Technical City couldn't decide between NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 and Matrox Condor. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Quadro RTX 4000 is a workstation card while Matrox Condor is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Quadro RTX 4000 and Matrox Condor, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.