Intel Cedarview vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

#ad
Buy
VS
#ad
Buy

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking99not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money27.39no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2021)PowerVR SGX545 (2008−2010)
GPU code nameTU104Cedarview
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date13 November 2018 (5 years old)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$899 no data
Current price$974 (1.1x MSRP)$778
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores230432
Core clock speed1005 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1545 MHzno data
Number of transistors13,600 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)160 Wattno data
Texture fill rate222.5no data

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length241 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount8 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed13000 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth416.0 GB/sno data

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-Cno data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)10.1
Shader Model6.54.1
OpenGL4.6ES 2.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA7.5no data

Advantages and disadvantages


Chip lithography 12 nm 65 nm

We couldn't decide between Quadro RTX 4000 and Cedarview. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 4000 is a workstation card while Cedarview is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
Quadro RTX 4000
Intel Cedarview
Cedarview

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 424 votes

Rate NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

This video card has no user ratings yet.

Rate Intel Cedarview on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.