ATI Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory vs Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking153not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency21.67no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Rage 9 (2003−2006)
GPU code nameTU104RV370
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date27 May 2019 (5 years ago)25 October 2006 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560no data
Core clock speed1110 MHz325 MHz
Boost clock speed1560 MHzno data
Number of transistors13,600 million107 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)110 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate249.61.300
Floating-point processing power7.987 TFLOPSno data
ROPs644
TMUs1604
Tensor Cores320no data
Ray Tracing Cores40no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR
Maximum RAM amount8 GB128 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz300 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s4.8 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)9.0
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA7.5-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 May 2019 25 October 2006
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 12 nm 110 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 110 Watt 30 Watt

RTX 4000 Mobile has an age advantage of 12 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 816.7% more advanced lithography process.

ATI X300 SE HyperMemory, on the other hand, has 266.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile and Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
ATI Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory
Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 30 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 3 votes

Rate Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.