ATI Radeon 7200 vs Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking2011601
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency21.64no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code nameTU104R100
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date27 May 2019 (6 years ago)1 April 2000 (25 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560no data
Core clock speed1110 MHz166 MHz
Boost clock speed1560 MHzno data
Number of transistors13,600 million30 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)110 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rate249.61
Floating-point processing power7.987 TFLOPSno data
ROPs642
TMUs1606
Tensor Cores320no data
Ray Tracing Cores40no data
L1 Cache2.5 MBno data
L2 Cache4 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR
Maximum RAM amount8 GB32 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz166 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s5.312 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)7.0
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.61.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA7.5-
DLSS+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD107no data
1440p63no data
4K47no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 170−180 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 65−70 no data

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 101 no data
Counter-Strike 2 170−180 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75 no data
Far Cry 5 106 no data
Fortnite 140−150 no data
Forza Horizon 4 120−130 no data
Forza Horizon 5 95−100 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 65−70 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130 no data
Valorant 190−200 no data

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 87 no data
Counter-Strike 2 170−180 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75 no data
Dota 2 132 no data
Far Cry 5 100 no data
Fortnite 140−150 no data
Forza Horizon 4 120−130 no data
Forza Horizon 5 95−100 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 110−120 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 65−70 no data
Metro Exodus 70−75 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 143 no data
Valorant 190−200 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 81 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75 no data
Dota 2 127 no data
Far Cry 5 96 no data
Forza Horizon 4 120−130 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 65−70 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75 no data
Valorant 190−200 no data

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 140−150 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 70−75 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 60−65 no data
Metro Exodus 40−45 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 no data
Valorant 230−240 no data

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 66 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35 no data
Far Cry 5 69 no data
Forza Horizon 4 85−90 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60 no data

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 80−85 no data

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 30−35 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 60−65 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22 no data
Metro Exodus 27−30 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 51 no data
Valorant 190−200 no data

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 42 no data
Counter-Strike 2 30−35 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16 no data
Dota 2 106 no data
Far Cry 5 36 no data
Forza Horizon 4 55−60 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 35−40 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 May 2019 1 April 2000
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 32 MB
Chip lithography 12 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 110 Watt 23 Watt

RTX 4000 Mobile has an age advantage of 19 years, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 7200, on the other hand, has 378.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile and Radeon 7200. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon 7200 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
ATI Radeon 7200
Radeon 7200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 47 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 24 votes

Rate Radeon 7200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile or Radeon 7200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.