GeForce2 MX 200 LP vs Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking201not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency21.63no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameTU104NV11 B3
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date27 May 2019 (6 years ago)3 March 2001 (24 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560no data
Core clock speed1110 MHz175 MHz
Boost clock speed1560 MHzno data
Number of transistors13,600 million20 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)110 Wattno data
Texture fill rate249.60.7
Floating-point processing power7.987 TFLOPSno data
ROPs642
TMUs1604
Tensor Cores320no data
Ray Tracing Cores40no data
L1 Cache2.5 MBno data
L2 Cache4 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6SDR
Maximum RAM amount8 GB32 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz166 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s1.328 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)7.0
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.61.2
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA7.5-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 May 2019 3 March 2001
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 32 MB
Chip lithography 12 nm 180 nm

RTX 4000 Mobile has an age advantage of 18 years, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile and GeForce2 MX 200 LP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile is a mobile workstation graphics card while GeForce2 MX 200 LP is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
NVIDIA GeForce2 MX 200 LP
GeForce2 MX 200 LP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 46 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce2 MX 200 LP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile or GeForce2 MX 200 LP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.