Radeon Pro W6300M vs Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking219not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency27.78no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameTU104Navi 24
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date27 May 2019 (6 years ago)19 January 2022 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560768
Core clock speed780 MHz1512 MHz
Boost clock speed1380 MHz2040 MHz
Number of transistors13,600 million5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate220.897.92
Floating-point processing power7.066 TFLOPS3.133 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs16048
Tensor Cores320no data
Ray Tracing Cores4012
L0 Cacheno data192 KB
L1 Cache2.5 MB256 KB
L2 Cache4 MB1024 KB
L3 Cacheno data8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x4
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit32 Bit
Memory clock speed1625 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth416.0 GB/s64 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.5-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 May 2019 19 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 25 Watt

RTX 4000 Max-Q has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Pro W6300M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 220% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q and Radeon Pro W6300M. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 26 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon Pro W6300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q or Radeon Pro W6300M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.