Radeon R7 350 Fake Card vs Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameTU106Opal
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date27 May 2019 (6 years ago)2015 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1920384
Core clock speed945 MHz1050 MHz
Boost clock speed1380 MHzno data
Number of transistors10,800 million950 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate165.625.20
Floating-point processing power5.299 TFLOPSno data
ROPs648
TMUs12024
Tensor Cores240no data
Ray Tracing Cores30no data
L1 Cache1.9 MBno data
L2 Cache4 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount6 GB2 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz4.6 GB/s
Memory bandwidth336.0 GB/s36.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 1.4a, 1x DisplayPort 1.2, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.56.5 (5.1)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1 (1.2)
Vulkan1.21.2.170
CUDA7.5-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 35 Watt

RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh has a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133% more advanced lithography process.

R7 350 Fake Card, on the other hand, has 129% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh and Radeon R7 350 Fake Card. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon R7 350 Fake Card is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 7 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 12 votes

Rate Radeon R7 350 Fake Card on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh or Radeon R7 350 Fake Card, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.