Apple M4 40-core GPU vs Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)no data
GPU code nameTU106no data
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date27 May 2019 (6 years ago)30 October 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1920 ×240
Core clock speed945 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1380 MHzno data
Number of transistors10,800 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)160 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate165.6 ×2no data
Floating-point processing power5.299 TFLOPS ×2no data
ROPs64 ×2no data
TMUs120 ×2no data
Tensor Cores240 ×2no data
Ray Tracing Cores30 ×2no data
L1 Cache1.9 MBno data
L2 Cache4 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6LPDDR5x-8533
Maximum RAM amount6 GB ×2no data
Memory bus width192 Bit ×2no data
Memory clock speed1750 MHz8533 MHz
Memory bandwidth336.0 GB/s ×2no data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependentno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)no data
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.3-
CUDA7.5-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 May 2019 30 October 2024
Chip lithography 12 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 160 Watt 45 Watt

Apple M4 40-core GPU has an age advantage of 5 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 255.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile and M4 40-core GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile is a mobile workstation graphics card while Apple M4 40-core GPU is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile
Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile
Apple M4 40-core GPU
M4 40-core GPU

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 89 votes

Rate M4 40-core GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile or M4 40-core GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.