Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs Quadro Plex 2200 S4

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGT200BTU102
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date25 July 2008 (17 years ago)13 August 2018 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$9,999

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores240 ×44608
Core clock speed648 MHz1230 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1620 MHz
Number of transistors1,400 million18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)600 Watt260 Watt
Texture fill rate51.84 ×4466.6
Floating-point processing power0.6221 TFLOPS ×414.93 TFLOPS
ROPs32 ×496
TMUs80 ×4288
Tensor Coresno data576
Ray Tracing Coresno data72
L1 Cacheno data4.5 MB
L2 Cache256 KB6 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length522 mm267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB ×448 GB
Memory bus width512 Bit ×4384 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth102.4 GB/s ×4672.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.5
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA1.37.5
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 July 2008 13 August 2018
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 48 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 600 Watt 260 Watt

RTX 8000 Passive has an age advantage of 10 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 358.3% more advanced lithography process, and 130.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro Plex 2200 S4 and Quadro RTX 8000 Passive. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2200 S4
Quadro Plex 2200 S4
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive
Quadro RTX 8000 Passive

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro Plex 2200 S4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 23 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 8000 Passive on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro Plex 2200 S4 or Quadro RTX 8000 Passive, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.