Matrox Parhelia DL256 vs Quadro Plex 2200 S4

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Parhelia (2002−2006)
GPU code nameGT200BParhelia-512
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date25 July 2008 (17 years ago)2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores240 ×4no data
Core clock speed648 MHz200 MHz
Number of transistors1,400 million80 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)600 Wattno data
Texture fill rate51.84 ×43.200
Floating-point processing power0.6221 TFLOPS ×4no data
ROPs32 ×44
TMUs80 ×416
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCI-X
Length522 mm190 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount4 GB ×4256 MB
Memory bus width512 Bit ×464 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz500 MBps
Memory bandwidth102.4 GB/s ×44 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x LFH60

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)8.1
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.31.3
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.3-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 55 nm 150 nm

Plex 2200 S4 has a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 172.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro Plex 2200 S4 and Matrox Parhelia DL256. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro Plex 2200 S4 is a workstation graphics card while Matrox Parhelia DL256 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2200 S4
Quadro Plex 2200 S4
Matrox Parhelia DL256
Parhelia DL256

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro Plex 2200 S4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Matrox Parhelia DL256 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro Plex 2200 S4 or Matrox Parhelia DL256, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.