Radeon RX Vega 3 vs Quadro Plex 2100 D4

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated845
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data14.04
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameG92Picasso
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date25 July 2008 (17 years ago)6 January 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128 ×4192
Core clock speed500 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1001 MHz
Number of transistors754 million4,940 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)640 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate32.00 ×412.01
Floating-point processing power0.32 TFLOPS ×40.3844 TFLOPS
ROPs16 ×44
TMUs64 ×412
L2 Cache64 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16IGP
Length522 mmno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GB ×4System Shared
Memory bus width256 Bit ×4System Shared
Memory clock speed800 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s ×4no data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.4
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 July 2008 6 January 2019
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 640 Watt 15 Watt

RX Vega 3 has an age advantage of 10 years, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 4166.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro Plex 2100 D4 and Radeon RX Vega 3. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro Plex 2100 D4 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX Vega 3 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2100 D4
Quadro Plex 2100 D4
AMD Radeon RX Vega 3
Radeon RX Vega 3

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 2 votes

Rate Quadro Plex 2100 D4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 2223 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro Plex 2100 D4 or Radeon RX Vega 3, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.