Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
P620 vs K4200
Combined performance score
K4200 outperforms P620 by 19% in our combined benchmark results.
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 384 | 434 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Value for money | 4.25 | 20.74 |
Architecture | Kepler (2012−2018) | Pascal (2016−2021) |
GPU code name | GK104 | GP107 |
Market segment | Workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 22 July 2014 (9 years old) | 27 May 2019 (4 years old) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $854.99 | no data |
Current price | $311 (0.4x MSRP) | $170 |
Quadro P620 has 388% better value for money than Quadro K4200.
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1344 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 771 MHz | 1177 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 784 MHz | 1442 MHz |
Number of transistors | 3,540 million | 3,300 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 108 Watt | 25 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 87.81 | 43.33 |
Floating-point performance | 2,107 gflops | 1,490 gflops |
Size and compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | 145 mm |
Width | 1-slot | 1-slot |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5400 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 172.8 GB/s | 80.13 GB/s |
Shared memory | no data | - |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
API support
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | + | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 3.0 | 6.1 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
K4200 outperforms P620 by 19% in our combined benchmark results.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 25%
K4200 outperforms P620 by 19% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 OpenCL
Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.
Benchmark coverage: 9%
K4200 outperforms P620 by 1% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.
GeekBench 5 Vulkan
Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.
Benchmark coverage: 5%
K4200 outperforms P620 by 8% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan.
GeekBench 5 CUDA
Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.
Benchmark coverage: 4%
P620 outperforms K4200 by 31% in GeekBench 5 CUDA.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 55−60
+14.6%
| 48
−14.6%
|
Advantages and disadvantages
Performance score | 11.14 | 9.34 |
Recency | 22 July 2014 | 27 May 2019 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 108 Watt | 25 Watt |
The Quadro K4200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P620 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.