Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4 vs Quadro P6000

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking107not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money18.69no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameGP102Tiger Lake Xe
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date1 October 2016 (7 years old)15 August 2020 (3 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$5,999 no data
Current price$989 (0.2x MSRP)no data

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384080
Core clock speed1506 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1645 MHzno data
Number of transistors11,800 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology16 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Wattno data
Texture fill rate394.8no data
Floating-point performance12,634 gflopsno data

Size and compatibility

Information on Quadro P6000 and Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2" (5.1 cm)no data
Supplementary power connectors1 x 8-pinno data
SLI options+no data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type384 BitDDR4
Maximum RAM amount24 GBno data
Memory bus width384 Bitno data
Memory clock speed9016 MHzno data
Memory bandwidthUp to 432 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDVI-D DP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereono data
Number of simultaneous displays4no data
Multi-display synchronizationQuadro Sync IIno data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

ECC (Error Correcting Code)+no data
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
High-Performance Video I/O6+no data
nView Desktop Management+no data
Quick Syncno data+

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12DirectX 12_1
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.5no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan+no data
CUDA6.1no data

Advantages and disadvantages


Recency 1 October 2016 15 August 2020
Chip lithography 16 nm 10 nm

We couldn't decide between Quadro P6000 and Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro P6000 is a workstation card while Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P6000
Quadro P6000
Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 84 votes

Rate Quadro P6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 6 votes

Rate Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.