Tesla S1075 vs Quadro P6000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking142not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.73no data
Power efficiency11.41no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameGP102GT200B
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date1 October 2016 (9 years ago)1 June 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$5,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3840240 ×4
Core clock speed1506 MHz610 MHz
Boost clock speed1645 MHzno data
Number of transistors11,800 million1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt800 Watt
Texture fill rate394.848.80 ×4
Floating-point processing power12.63 TFLOPS0.6221 TFLOPS ×4
ROPs9632 ×4
TMUs24080 ×4
L1 Cache1.4 MBno data
L2 Cache3 MB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2" (5.1 cm)2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1 x 8-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type384 BitGDDR3
Maximum RAM amount24 GB4 GB ×4
Memory bus width384 Bit512 Bit ×4
Memory clock speed1127 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 432 GB/s102.4 GB/s ×4

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x DisplayPortNo outputs
Number of simultaneous displays4no data
Multi-display synchronizationQuadro Sync IIno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

ECC (Error Correcting Code)+no data
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
High-Performance Video I/O6+no data
nView Desktop Management+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1211.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.44.0
OpenGL4.53.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA6.11.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2016 1 June 2008
Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 800 Watt

Quadro P6000 has an age advantage of 8 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 243.8% more advanced lithography process, and 220% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro P6000 and Tesla S1075. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P6000
Quadro P6000
NVIDIA Tesla S1075
Tesla S1075

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 119 votes

Rate Quadro P6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2 votes

Rate Tesla S1075 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P6000 or Tesla S1075, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.