ATI Graphics Pro Turbo vs Quadro P6000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking105not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.86no data
Power efficiency11.03no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Mach (1992−1997)
GPU code nameGP102Mach64
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1 October 2016 (8 years ago)1995 (29 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$5,999 $449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3840no data
Core clock speed1506 MHz40 MHz
Boost clock speed1645 MHzno data
Number of transistors11,800 million1 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm600 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Wattno data
Texture fill rate394.8no data
Floating-point processing power12.63 TFLOPSno data
ROPs961
TMUs240no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCI
Length267 mmno data
Width2" (5.1 cm)1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1 x 8-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type384 BitVRAM
Maximum RAM amount24 GB2 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1127 MHz40 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 432 GB/s320.0 MB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort1x VGA
Number of simultaneous displays4no data
Multi-display synchronizationQuadro Sync IIno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

ECC (Error Correcting Code)+no data
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
High-Performance Video I/O6+no data
nView Desktop Management+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12N/A
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.5N/A
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA6.1-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 2 MB
Chip lithography 16 nm 600 nm

Quadro P6000 has a 1228700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 3650% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro P6000 and Graphics Pro Turbo. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro P6000 is a workstation graphics card while Graphics Pro Turbo is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P6000
Quadro P6000
ATI Graphics Pro Turbo
Graphics Pro Turbo

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 89 votes

Rate Quadro P6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 17 votes

Rate Graphics Pro Turbo on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.