FirePro V7900 vs Quadro P600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P600 and FirePro V7900, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Quadro P600
2017
2 GB GDDR5, 25 Watt
8.48
+42%

Quadro P600 outperforms FirePro V7900 by a considerable 42% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking470555
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation9.302.39
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)
GPU code nameGP107Cayman
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date14 November 2017 (6 years ago)24 May 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$178 no data
Current price$207 (1.2x MSRP)$165

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro P600 has 289% better value for money than FirePro V7900.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3841280
Core clock speed1430 MHz725 MHz
Boost clock speed1620 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,300 million2,640 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt151 Watt
Texture fill rate37.3758.00
Floating-point performance1,117 gflops1,856.0 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 2.1 x16
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length145 mm279 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Form factorno datafull height / full length
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed5012 MHz5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth64.13 GB/s160 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort4x DisplayPort
StereoOutput3Dno data1
DisplayPort countno data4
Dual-link DVI supportno data1

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA6.1no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P600 8.48
+42%
FirePro V7900 5.97

Quadro P600 outperforms FirePro V7900 by 42% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro P600 3275
+42.1%
FirePro V7900 2304

Quadro P600 outperforms FirePro V7900 by 42% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD43
+43.3%
30−35
−43.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+38.5%
12−14
−38.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Battlefield 5 35−40
+34.6%
24−27
−34.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
+41.2%
16−18
−41.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+38.5%
12−14
−38.5%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+26.3%
18−20
−26.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
+25%
24−27
−25%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+34.1%
40−45
−34.1%
Hitman 3 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+35.1%
35−40
−35.1%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+40%
24−27
−40%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
+25%
24−27
−25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+34.6%
24−27
−34.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+40.6%
30−35
−40.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Battlefield 5 35−40
+34.6%
24−27
−34.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
+41.2%
16−18
−41.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+38.5%
12−14
−38.5%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+26.3%
18−20
−26.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
+25%
24−27
−25%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+34.1%
40−45
−34.1%
Hitman 3 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+35.1%
35−40
−35.1%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+40%
24−27
−40%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
+25%
24−27
−25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+34.6%
24−27
−34.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+40%
25
−40%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+40.6%
30−35
−40.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
+41.2%
16−18
−41.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+38.5%
12−14
−38.5%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+26.3%
18−20
−26.3%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+34.1%
40−45
−34.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+35.1%
35−40
−35.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+34.6%
24−27
−34.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+28.6%
14
−28.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+40.6%
30−35
−40.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
+25%
24−27
−25%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+38.5%
12−14
−38.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+38.5%
12−14
−38.5%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+40%
14−16
−40%
Hitman 3 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+27.3%
10−12
−27.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Hitman 3 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%

This is how Quadro P600 and FirePro V7900 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P600 is 43% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.48 5.97
Recency 14 November 2017 24 May 2011
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 151 Watt

The Quadro P600 is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro V7900 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P600
Quadro P600
AMD FirePro V7900
FirePro V7900

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 152 votes

Rate Quadro P600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 16 votes

Rate FirePro V7900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.