FirePro S7150 vs Quadro P600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P600 and FirePro S7150, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Quadro P600
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 40 Watt
8.62

S7150 outperforms P600 by a moderate 14% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking502461
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.710.63
Power efficiency14.864.51
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameGP107Tonga
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date7 February 2017 (7 years ago)1 February 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$178 $2,399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro P600 has 965% better value for money than FirePro S7150.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3842048
Core clock speed1430 MHz920 MHz
Boost clock speed1620 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,300 million5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate38.88117.8
Floating-point processing power1.244 TFLOPS3.768 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs24128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length145 mm241 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1252 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth80.13 GB/s160.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.76.3
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.0
Vulkan1.31.2.131
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P600 8.62
FirePro S7150 9.81
+13.8%

  • Other tests
    • Passmark
    • GeekBench 5 OpenCL
    • GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P600 3312
FirePro S7150 3770
+13.8%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Quadro P600 10593
FirePro S7150 27136
+156%

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Quadro P600 9744
FirePro S7150 29690
+205%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD36
−11.1%
40−45
+11.1%

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.94
+1113%
59.98
−1113%
  • Quadro P600 has 1113% lower cost per frame in 1080p

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
Battlefield 5 27−30
−7.1%
30−33
+7.1%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
−4.3%
24−27
+4.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−4.3%
24−27
+4.3%
Valorant 30−35
−9.4%
35−40
+9.4%
Battlefield 5 27−30
−7.1%
30−33
+7.1%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
Dota 2 27
−11.1%
30−33
+11.1%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−8.1%
40−45
+8.1%
Fortnite 50−55
−7.8%
55−60
+7.8%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
−12.9%
35−40
+12.9%
Metro Exodus 21−24
−4.3%
24−27
+4.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95
−5.3%
100−105
+5.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−4.3%
24−27
+4.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−3.8%
27−30
+3.8%
Valorant 30−35
−9.4%
35−40
+9.4%
World of Tanks 120−130
−9.4%
140−150
+9.4%
Battlefield 5 27−30
−7.1%
30−33
+7.1%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
Dota 2 72
−11.1%
80−85
+11.1%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−8.1%
40−45
+8.1%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
−10.3%
75−80
+10.3%
Valorant 30−35
−9.4%
35−40
+9.4%
Dota 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
−7.1%
45−50
+7.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
World of Tanks 60−65
−12.9%
70−75
+12.9%
Battlefield 5 16−18
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−12.9%
35−40
+12.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
−7.7%
14−16
+7.7%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 21−24
−9.1%
24−27
+9.1%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 18−20
−10.5%
21−24
+10.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
−10.5%
21−24
+10.5%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
−8%
27−30
+8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−10.5%
21−24
+10.5%
Battlefield 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 18−20
−10.5%
21−24
+10.5%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Fortnite 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Valorant 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%

This is how Quadro P600 and FirePro S7150 compete in popular games:

  • FirePro S7150 is 11% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.62 9.81
Recency 7 February 2017 1 February 2016
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 150 Watt

Quadro P600 has an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 275% lower power consumption.

FirePro S7150, on the other hand, has a 13.8% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The FirePro S7150 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P600 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P600
Quadro P600
AMD FirePro S7150
FirePro S7150

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5
217 votes

Rate Quadro P600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2
9 votes

Rate FirePro S7150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.