ATI All-In-Wonder 9200 SE vs Quadro P600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking558not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.65no data
Power efficiency15.23no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameGP107RV280
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date7 February 2017 (8 years ago)26 January 2004 (21 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$178 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384no data
Core clock speed1430 MHz250 MHz
Boost clock speed1620 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,300 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Wattno data
Texture fill rate38.881.000
Floating-point processing power1.244 TFLOPSno data
ROPs164
TMUs244
L1 Cache144 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 8x
Length145 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount4 GB128 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1252 MHz164 MHz
Memory bandwidth80.13 GB/s2.624 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x VGA, 2x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)8.1
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.61.4
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA6.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 February 2017 26 January 2004
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 150 nm

Quadro P600 has an age advantage of 13 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 971.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro P600 and All-In-Wonder 9200 SE. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro P600 is a workstation graphics card while All-In-Wonder 9200 SE is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P600
Quadro P600
ATI All-In-Wonder 9200 SE
All-In-Wonder 9200 SE

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 243 votes

Rate Quadro P600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate All-In-Wonder 9200 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P600 or All-In-Wonder 9200 SE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.