GMA 3150 vs Quadro P5000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking2061600
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.77no data
Power efficiency12.97no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Generation 4.0 (2006−2007)
GPU code nameGP104Pineview
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date1 October 2016 (9 years ago)9 May 2007 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores204816
Core clock speed1607 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1733 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,200 million123 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rate277.30.8
Floating-point processing power8.873 TFLOPS0.0128 TFLOPS
ROPs641
TMUs1602
L1 Cache960 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCI
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount16 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1127 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth192 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x DisplayPortNo outputs
Display Port1.4no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Stereo+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX129.0c
Shader Model6.43.0
OpenGL4.52.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P5000 12715
+635650%
Samples: 1028
GMA 3150 2
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD93no data
4K41no data

Cost per frame, $

1080p26.87no data
4K60.95no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 170−180 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 65−70 no data

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 110−120 no data
Counter-Strike 2 170−180 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70 no data
Far Cry 5 100−105 no data
Fortnite 140−150 no data
Forza Horizon 4 120−130 no data
Forza Horizon 5 95−100 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 65−70 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130 no data
Valorant 190−200 no data

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 110−120 no data
Counter-Strike 2 170−180 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70 no data
Dota 2 130−140 no data
Far Cry 5 100−105 no data
Fortnite 140−150 no data
Forza Horizon 4 120−130 no data
Forza Horizon 5 95−100 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 100−110 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 65−70 no data
Metro Exodus 70−75 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 98 no data
Valorant 190−200 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 110−120 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70 no data
Dota 2 130−140 no data
Far Cry 5 100−105 no data
Forza Horizon 4 120−130 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 65−70 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 53 no data
Valorant 190−200 no data

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 140−150 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 70−75 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 210−220 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 60−65 no data
Metro Exodus 40−45 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 no data
Valorant 230−240 no data

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 80−85 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35 no data
Far Cry 5 70−75 no data
Forza Horizon 4 80−85 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55 no data

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 75−80 no data

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 30−35 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 60−65 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22 no data
Metro Exodus 27−30 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 36 no data
Valorant 180−190 no data

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 45−50 no data
Counter-Strike 2 30−35 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16 no data
Dota 2 95−100 no data
Far Cry 5 35−40 no data
Forza Horizon 4 55−60 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 35−40 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2016 9 May 2007
Chip lithography 16 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 13 Watt

Quadro P5000 has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 181.3% more advanced lithography process.

GMA 3150, on the other hand, has 669.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro P5000 and GMA 3150. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro P5000 is a workstation graphics card while GMA 3150 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P5000
Quadro P5000
Intel GMA 3150
GMA 3150

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 195 votes

Rate Quadro P5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 174 votes

Rate GMA 3150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P5000 or GMA 3150, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.