RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile vs Quadro P5000 Max-Q

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated106
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data23.80
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameN17E-Q5 Max-Qno data
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date11 January 2017 (7 years ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20483072
Core clock speed1101 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1366 MHzno data
Manufacturing process technology16 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt115 Watt (35 - 115 Watt TGP)

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed6006 MHz16000 MHz
Shared memory--

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 January 2017 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 115 Watt

P5000 Max-Q has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 15% lower power consumption.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 220% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro P5000 Max-Q and RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro P5000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation card while RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P5000 Max-Q
Quadro P5000 Max-Q
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 10 votes

Rate Quadro P5000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 18 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.