Playstation 5 Pro GPU vs Quadro P4200 Max-Q

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking187not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency21.19no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGP104Oberon Plus
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date21 February 2018 (6 years ago)7 November 2024
Launch price (MSRP)no data$699

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23043840
Core clock speed1215 MHz2800 MHz
Boost clock speed1480 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,200 million10,600 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt180 Watt
Texture fill rate213.1672.0
Floating-point processing power6.82 TFLOPS21.5 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs144240

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)no data
Lengthno data390 mm
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1753 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.4 GB/s448.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x HDMI 2.1, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)N/A
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)N/A
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.01.2
Vulkan1.31.2
CUDA6.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 February 2018 7 November 2024
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 180 Watt

P4200 Max-Q has 80% lower power consumption.

Playstation 5 Pro GPU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 166.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro P4200 Max-Q and Playstation 5 Pro GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro P4200 Max-Q is a mobile workstation card while Playstation 5 Pro GPU is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Max-Q
Quadro P4200 Max-Q
AMD Playstation 5 Pro GPU
Playstation 5 Pro GPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 2 votes

Rate Quadro P4200 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 25 votes

Rate Playstation 5 Pro GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.