ATI FirePro V8700 vs Quadro P4200 Max-Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking234not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency21.21no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameGP104RV770
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date21 February 2018 (8 years ago)11 September 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,499

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304800
Core clock speed1215 MHz750 MHz
Boost clock speed1480 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,200 million956 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt151 Watt
Texture fill rate213.130.00
Floating-point processing power6.82 TFLOPS1.2 TFLOPS
ROPs6416
TMUs14440
L1 Cache864 KB160 KB
L2 Cache2 MB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data254 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1753 MHz850 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.4 GB/s108.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)4.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL3.01.1
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA6.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 February 2018 11 September 2008
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 151 Watt

P4200 Max-Q has an age advantage of 9 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 243.8% more advanced lithography process, and 51% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro P4200 Max-Q and FirePro V8700. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro P4200 Max-Q is a mobile workstation graphics card while FirePro V8700 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Max-Q
Quadro P4200 Max-Q
ATI FirePro V8700
FirePro V8700

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 3 votes

Rate Quadro P4200 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 6 votes

Rate FirePro V8700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P4200 Max-Q or FirePro V8700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.