Quadro P4000 vs Titan X Pascal

#ad
Buy
VS
#ad
Buy

Combined performance score

Titan X Pascal
33.61
+11.7%

Titan X Pascal outperforms Quadro P4000 by 12% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking146171
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money15.1525.23
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGP102GP104
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date25 July 2016 (7 years old)6 February 2017 (7 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,199 $815
Current price$312 (0.3x MSRP)$485 (0.6x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro P4000 has 67% better value for money than Titan X Pascal.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores35841792
Core clock speed1418 MHz1202 MHz
Boost clock speed1531 MHz1480 MHz
Number of transistors11,800 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate342.9165.8
Floating-point performance10,974 gflops5,304 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm241 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 6-pin

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5XGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount12 GB8 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed10000 MHz7604 MHz
Memory bandwidth480.4 GB/s192 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort4x DisplayPort
HDMI+no data
Display Portno data1.4
G-SYNC support+no data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimusno data+
3D Stereono data+
Mosaicno data+
nView Display Managementno data+
Optimusno data+

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan++
CUDA+6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Titan X Pascal 33.61
+11.7%
Quadro P4000 30.10

Titan X Pascal outperforms Quadro P4000 by 12% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Titan X Pascal 13026
+11.7%
Quadro P4000 11665

Titan X Pascal outperforms Quadro P4000 by 12% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD126
+85.3%
68
−85.3%
1440p76
+16.9%
65−70
−16.9%
4K59
+18%
50−55
−18%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 79
+54.9%
50−55
−54.9%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 104
+82.5%
55−60
−82.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 95
+79.2%
50−55
−79.2%
Battlefield 5 153
+62.8%
90−95
−62.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 155
+91.4%
80−85
−91.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 78
+52.9%
50−55
−52.9%
Far Cry 5 162
+108%
75−80
−108%
Far Cry New Dawn 150
+94.8%
75−80
−94.8%
Forza Horizon 4 127
+30.9%
95−100
−30.9%
Hitman 3 163
+75.3%
90−95
−75.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 107
+64.6%
65−70
−64.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 104
+112%
45−50
−112%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 136
+97.1%
65−70
−97.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 104
+82.5%
55−60
−82.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 87
+52.6%
55−60
−52.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 85
+60.4%
50−55
−60.4%
Battlefield 5 147
+56.4%
90−95
−56.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 123
+51.9%
80−85
−51.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 69
+35.3%
50−55
−35.3%
Far Cry 5 149
+91%
75−80
−91%
Far Cry New Dawn 140
+81.8%
75−80
−81.8%
Forza Horizon 4 121
+24.7%
95−100
−24.7%
Hitman 3 143
+53.8%
90−95
−53.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 84
+29.2%
65−70
−29.2%
Metro Exodus 96
+84.6%
50−55
−84.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 58
+18.4%
45−50
−18.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 114
+65.2%
65−70
−65.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 184
+139%
77
−139%
Watch Dogs: Legion 91
+59.6%
55−60
−59.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 67
+17.5%
55−60
−17.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 63
+18.9%
50−55
−18.9%
Battlefield 5 137
+45.7%
90−95
−45.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 59
+15.7%
50−55
−15.7%
Far Cry 5 140
+79.5%
75−80
−79.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 127
+64.9%
75−80
−64.9%
Forza Horizon 4 112
+15.5%
95−100
−15.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 95
+132%
41
−132%
Watch Dogs: Legion 64
+12.3%
55−60
−12.3%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 84
+75%
45−50
−75%
Hitman 3 87
+67.3%
50−55
−67.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60
+50%
40−45
−50%
Metro Exodus 58
+87.1%
30−35
−87.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 37
+60.9%
21−24
−60.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 78
+85.7%
40−45
−85.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+12.1%
30−35
−12.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 51
+64.5%
30−35
−64.5%
Battlefield 5 70−75
+10.6%
65−70
−10.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 38
+81%
21−24
−81%
Far Cry 5 101
+90.6%
50−55
−90.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 101
+74.1%
55−60
−74.1%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+11.1%
60−65
−11.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+15.4%
35−40
−15.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 46
+84%
24−27
−84%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 49
+96%
24−27
−96%
Hitman 3 47
+62.1%
27−30
−62.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 17
−23.5%
21−24
+23.5%
Metro Exodus 36
+80%
20−22
−80%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24
+50%
16−18
−50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 42
+90.9%
21−24
−90.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 68
+100%
30−35
−100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 38
+90%
20−22
−90%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 32
+88.2%
16−18
−88.2%
Battlefield 5 71
+97.2%
35−40
−97.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 18
+125%
8−9
−125%
Far Cry 5 53
+96.3%
27−30
−96.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 56
+86.7%
30−33
−86.7%
Forza Horizon 4 73
+73.8%
40−45
−73.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 26
+85.7%
14−16
−85.7%

This is how Titan X Pascal and Quadro P4000 compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • Titan X Pascal is 85.3% faster than Quadro P4000

1440p resolution:

  • Titan X Pascal is 16.9% faster than Quadro P4000

4K resolution:

  • Titan X Pascal is 18% faster than Quadro P4000

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Titan X Pascal is 139% faster than the Quadro P4000.
  • in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Quadro P4000 is 23.5% faster than the Titan X Pascal.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Titan X Pascal is ahead in 67 tests (99%)
  • Quadro P4000 is ahead in 1 test (1%)

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 33.61 30.10
Recency 25 July 2016 6 February 2017
Cost $1199 $815
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 8 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 100 Watt

The Titan X Pascal is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P4000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Titan X Pascal is a desktop card while Quadro P4000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
Titan X Pascal
NVIDIA Quadro P4000
Quadro P4000

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 2982 votes

Rate NVIDIA Titan X Pascal on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 252 votes

Rate NVIDIA Quadro P4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.