Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU vs Quadro P4000 Max-Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking288not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency16.05no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)no data
GPU code nameGP104no data
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date11 January 2017 (8 years ago)30 October 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores179220
Core clock speed1114 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1228 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology16 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate137.5no data
Floating-point processing power4.401 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs112no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5LPDDR5x-8533
Maximum RAM amount8 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1502 MHz8533 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.3 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)no data
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan+-
CUDA6.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 January 2017 30 October 2024
Chip lithography 16 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 45 Watt

Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU has an age advantage of 7 years, a 433.3% more advanced lithography process, and 122.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro P4000 Max-Q and M4 Pro 20-Core GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro P4000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation graphics card while Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU
M4 Pro 20-Core GPU

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro P4000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 7 votes

Rate M4 Pro 20-Core GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P4000 Max-Q or M4 Pro 20-Core GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.