Radeon HD 8370D IGP vs Quadro P400

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking688not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.35no data
Power efficiency9.85no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)
GPU code nameGP107Scrapper Lite
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date7 February 2017 (8 years ago)July 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$119.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256128
Core clock speed1228 MHz760 MHz
Boost clock speed1252 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,300 million1,303 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate20.036.080
Floating-point processing power0.641 TFLOPS0.1946 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs168

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Length145 mmno data
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1002 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth32.06 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors3x mini-DisplayPortNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA6.1-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 65 Watt

Quadro P400 has a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 116.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro P400 and Radeon HD 8370D IGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro P400 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon HD 8370D IGP is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P400
Quadro P400
AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP
Radeon HD 8370D IGP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 495 votes

Rate Quadro P400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 104 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8370D IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P400 or Radeon HD 8370D IGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.