GeForce FX 5600 XT vs Quadro P400

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking677not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.84no data
Power efficiency9.90no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameGP107NV31
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date7 February 2017 (7 years ago)17 March 2003 (21 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$119.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256no data
Core clock speed1228 MHz235 MHz
Boost clock speed1252 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,300 million80 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Wattno data
Texture fill rate20.030.94
Floating-point processing power0.641 TFLOPSno data
ROPs164
TMUs164

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 8x
Length145 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount2 GB128 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1002 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidth32.06 GB/s6.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors3x mini-DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0a
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.61.5 (2.1)
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA6.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 February 2017 17 March 2003
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 130 nm

Quadro P400 has an age advantage of 13 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro P400 and GeForce FX 5600 XT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro P400 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce FX 5600 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P400
Quadro P400
NVIDIA GeForce FX 5600 XT
GeForce FX 5600 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 486 votes

Rate Quadro P400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 28 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5600 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.