GMA 3000 vs Quadro P400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking740not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.97no data
Power efficiency10.12no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Generation 4.0 (2006−2007)
GPU code nameGP107Broadwater
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date7 February 2017 (8 years ago)1 June 2006 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$119.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256no data
Core clock speed1228 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1252 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,300 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rate20.031.600
Floating-point processing power0.641 TFLOPSno data
ROPs164
TMUs164
L1 Cache96 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length145 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1002 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth32.06 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors3x mini-DisplayPortNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0c
Shader Model6.43.0
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA6.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 February 2017 1 June 2006
Chip lithography 14 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 13 Watt

Quadro P400 has an age advantage of 10 years, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

GMA 3000, on the other hand, has 130.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro P400 and GMA 3000. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro P400 is a workstation graphics card while GMA 3000 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P400
Quadro P400
Intel GMA 3000
GMA 3000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 525 votes

Rate Quadro P400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 45 votes

Rate GMA 3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P400 or GMA 3000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.