Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU vs Quadro P3200
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 307 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 20.85 | no data |
| Architecture | Pascal (2016−2021) | GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) |
| GPU code name | GP104 | Vega 10 |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 21 February 2018 (8 years ago) | 29 June 2017 (8 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1792 | 3584 ×2 |
| Core clock speed | 1328 MHz | 852 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1543 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 7,200 million | 12,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 230 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 172.8 | 224.0 ×2 |
| Floating-point processing power | 5.53 TFLOPS | 7.168 TFLOPS ×2 |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 ×2 |
| TMUs | 112 | 224 ×2 |
| L1 Cache | 672 KB | 896 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1536 KB | 4 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 267 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | HBM2 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 16 GB ×2 |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 2048 Bit ×2 |
| Memory clock speed | 1753 MHz | 945 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 168.3 GB/s | 483.8 GB/s ×2 |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Optimus | + | - |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.125 |
| CUDA | 6.1 | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 21 February 2018 | 29 June 2017 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 16 GB |
| Chip lithography | 16 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 230 Watt |
Quadro P3200 has an age advantage of 7 months, and 207% lower power consumption.
Pro V320 MxGPU, on the other hand, has a 167% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 14% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Quadro P3200 and Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Quadro P3200 is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
