Radeon R7 M350 2GB vs Quadro P3200 Max-Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking293not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency22.49no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameGP104Litho
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date21 February 2018 (8 years ago)5 May 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1792384
Core clock speed1139 MHz825 MHz
Boost clock speed1404 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,200 million950 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Wattno data
Texture fill rate157.219.80
Floating-point processing power5.032 TFLOPS0.6336 TFLOPS
ROPs648
TMUs11224
L1 Cache672 KB96 KB
L2 Cache1536 KB128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount6 GB2 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1753 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth168.3 GB/s64 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.46.5 (5.1)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1 (1.2)
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.170
CUDA6.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 February 2018 5 May 2015
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 28 nm

P3200 Max-Q has an age advantage of 2 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro P3200 Max-Q and Radeon R7 M350 2GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro P3200 Max-Q is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon R7 M350 2GB is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q
Quadro P3200 Max-Q
AMD Radeon R7 M350 2GB
Radeon R7 M350 2GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 27 votes

Rate Quadro P3200 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 5 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M350 2GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P3200 Max-Q or Radeon R7 M350 2GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.