Radeon HD 8330 Mobile IGP vs Quadro P3200 Max-Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking291not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency22.20no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameGP104Kalindi
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date21 February 2018 (7 years ago)13 August 2013 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1792128
Core clock speed1139 MHz497 MHz
Boost clock speed1404 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,200 million1,178 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate157.23.976
Floating-point processing power5.032 TFLOPS0.1272 TFLOPS
ROPs644
TMUs1128
L1 Cache672 KBno data
L2 Cache1536 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)IGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount6 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width192 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1753 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth168.3 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.46.3
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA6.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 February 2018 13 August 2013
Chip lithography 16 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 15 Watt

P3200 Max-Q has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

HD 8330 Mobile IGP, on the other hand, has 400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro P3200 Max-Q and Radeon HD 8330 Mobile IGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro P3200 Max-Q is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon HD 8330 Mobile IGP is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q
Quadro P3200 Max-Q
AMD Radeon HD 8330 Mobile IGP
Radeon HD 8330 Mobile IGP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 26 votes

Rate Quadro P3200 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 3 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8330 Mobile IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P3200 Max-Q or Radeon HD 8330 Mobile IGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.