Jetson TX1 vs Quadro P3200 Max-Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking292not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency22.21no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameGP104GM20B
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date21 February 2018 (7 years ago)4 January 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1792256
Core clock speed1139 MHz998 MHz
Boost clock speed1404 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,200 million2,000 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm20 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt6 Watt
Texture fill rate157.215.97
Floating-point processing power5.032 TFLOPS0.511 TFLOPS
ROPs6416
TMUs11216
L1 Cache672 KB96 KB
L2 Cache1536 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 2.0 x4
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5LPDDR4
Maximum RAM amount6 GB4 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1753 MHz600 MHz
Memory bandwidth168.3 GB/s9.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.0
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.1
CUDA6.15.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 February 2018 4 January 2015
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 20 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 6 Watt

P3200 Max-Q has an age advantage of 3 years, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.

Jetson TX1, on the other hand, has 1150% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro P3200 Max-Q and Jetson TX1. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro P3200 Max-Q is a mobile workstation graphics card while Jetson TX1 is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q
Quadro P3200 Max-Q
NVIDIA Jetson TX1
Jetson TX1

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 26 votes

Rate Quadro P3200 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 4 votes

Rate Jetson TX1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P3200 Max-Q or Jetson TX1, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.