Radeon R3E Mobile Graphics vs Quadro P3000 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking379not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency15.69no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameGP104Beema
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date11 January 2017 (8 years ago)28 January 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280128
Core clock speed1088 MHz351 MHz
Boost clock speed1215 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,200 million930 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate97.202.808
Floating-point processing power3.11 TFLOPS0.08986 TFLOPS
ROPs484
TMUs808
L1 Cache480 KBno data
L2 Cache1536 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)IGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount6 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width192 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1753 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth168 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Display Port1.4no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Stereo+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (12_0)
Shader Model6.46.3
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA6.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 January 2017 28 January 2015
Chip lithography 16 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 100 Watt

P3000 Mobile has an age advantage of 1 year, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 33.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro P3000 Mobile and Radeon R3E Mobile Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro P3000 Mobile is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon R3E Mobile Graphics is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Mobile
Quadro P3000 Mobile
AMD Radeon R3E Mobile Graphics
Radeon R3E Mobile Graphics

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 195 votes

Rate Quadro P3000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 9 votes

Rate Radeon R3E Mobile Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P3000 Mobile or Radeon R3E Mobile Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.