FirePro M3900 vs Quadro P3000 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking385not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency15.61no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameGP104Seymour
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date11 January 2017 (9 years ago)19 October 2010 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280160
Core clock speed1088 MHz750 MHz
Boost clock speed1215 MHz750 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million370 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rate97.206.000
Floating-point processing power3.11 TFLOPS0.24 TFLOPS
ROPs484
TMUs808
L1 Cache480 KB16 KB
L2 Cache1536 KB128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportno datan/a
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 2.0 x16
Form factorno datachip-down

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount6 GB1 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1753 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth168 GB/s14 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Eyefinity-+
Display Port1.4no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Stereo+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1211.2 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.0
OpenGL4.54.4
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA6.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 January 2017 19 October 2010
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 20 Watt

P3000 Mobile has an age advantage of 6 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

FirePro M3900, on the other hand, has 275% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro P3000 Mobile and FirePro M3900. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 202 votes

Rate Quadro P3000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 13 votes

Rate FirePro M3900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P3000 Mobile or FirePro M3900, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.