ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3410 vs Quadro P2000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking347not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.85no data
Power efficiency17.79no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameGP106M82
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date6 February 2017 (8 years ago)25 July 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$585 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores102440
Core clock speed1076 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1480 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,400 million181 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt7 Watt
Texture fill rate94.721.600
Floating-point processing power3.031 TFLOPS0.032 TFLOPS
ROPs404
TMUs644
L1 Cache384 KBno data
L2 Cache1280 KB64 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-II
Length201 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR2
Maximum RAM amount5 GB256 MB
Memory bus width160 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1752 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth140.2 GB/s6.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPortNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)10.1
Shader Model6.44.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA6.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 February 2017 25 July 2008
Maximum RAM amount 5 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 16 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 7 Watt

Quadro P2000 has an age advantage of 8 years, a 1900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 243.8% more advanced lithography process.

ATI Mobility HD 3410, on the other hand, has 971.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro P2000 and Mobility Radeon HD 3410. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro P2000 is a workstation graphics card while Mobility Radeon HD 3410 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3410
Mobility Radeon HD 3410

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 748 votes

Rate Quadro P2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1 vote

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 3410 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P2000 or Mobility Radeon HD 3410, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.