NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20
Comparison of Quadro P2000 Mobile and Radeon Pro Vega 20 architecture, market type and release date.
Quadro P2000 Mobile and Radeon Pro Vega 20's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Quadro P2000 Mobile and Radeon Pro Vega 20's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Core clock speed
Manufacturing process technology
Power consumption (TDP)
Texture fill rate
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on Quadro P2000 Mobile and Radeon Pro Vega 20 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Parameters of memory installed on Quadro P2000 Mobile and Radeon Pro Vega 20: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Maximum RAM amount
Memory bus width
Memory clock speed
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on Quadro P2000 Mobile and Radeon Pro Vega 20. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference video cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model.
Technological solutions and APIs supported by Quadro P2000 Mobile and Radeon Pro Vega 20. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
3D Vision Pro
APIs supported by Quadro P2000 Mobile and Radeon Pro Vega 20, sometimes including their particular versions.
Non-gaming benchmarks performance of Quadro P2000 Mobile and Radeon Pro Vega 20. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall benchmark performance
P2000 Mobile 56.37 +109.1%
Pro Vega 20 26.96
3DMark Ice Storm GPU
P2000 Mobile 350317 +25.7%
Pro Vega 20 278586
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
P2000 Mobile 43566
Pro Vega 20 62318 +43%
3DMark Fire Strike Score
P2000 Mobile 6160
Pro Vega 20 7558 +22.7%
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
P2000 Mobile 6847
Pro Vega 20 9044 +32.1%
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
P2000 Mobile 8387
Pro Vega 20 12289 +46.5%
3DMark Vantage Performance
P2000 Mobile 32964
Pro Vega 20 33590 +1.9%
Let's see how good Quadro P2000 Mobile and Radeon Pro Vega 20 are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile
109.1% faster (about 2 times) in synthetic tests
Less power hungry (50 vs 100 watts)
Optimus (lowers energy usage by automatically switching between integrated and discrete NVIDIA GPU. Similar to AMD Enduro)
PhysX (hardware acceleration of physical simulation engine named PhysX)
3D Vision Pro
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20
Much newer (14 November 2018 vs 6 February 2017)
Wider memory bus (1024 vs 128 bit)
More pipelines (1280 vs 768)
Higher memory bandwidth (189.4 vs 96.13 GB/s)
So, Quadro P2000 Mobile or Pro Vega 20?
Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile.
Should you still have questions on choice between Quadro P2000 Mobile and Radeon Pro Vega 20, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.