L4 vs Quadro P2000 Max-Q

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P2000 Max-Q with L4, including specs and performance data.

P2000 Max-Q
2017
4 GB GDDR5
13.81

L4 outperforms P2000 Max-Q by a whopping 117% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking378194
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data28.71
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGP107GLAD104
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date5 July 2017 (7 years ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7687424
Core clock speed1215 MHz795 MHz
Boost clock speed1468 MHz2040 MHz
Number of transistorsno data35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data72 Watt
Texture fill rateno data489.6
Floating-point processing powerno data30.29 TFLOPS
ROPsno data80
TMUsno data240
Tensor Coresno data240
Ray Tracing Coresno data60

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data169 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB24 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed6008 MHz1563 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data300.1 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

P2000 Max-Q 13.81
L4 29.97
+117%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

P2000 Max-Q 5309
L4 11518
+117%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD50
−100%
100−110
+100%
4K22
−105%
45−50
+105%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−95.7%
45−50
+95.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−104%
55−60
+104%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
−111%
95−100
+111%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−95.7%
45−50
+95.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−104%
55−60
+104%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−114%
120−130
+114%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
−108%
75−80
+108%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−111%
80−85
+111%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−106%
70−75
+106%
Valorant 55−60
−100%
110−120
+100%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
−111%
95−100
+111%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−95.7%
45−50
+95.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−104%
55−60
+104%
Dota 2 50−55
−100%
100−105
+100%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−112%
110−120
+112%
Fortnite 75−80
−105%
160−170
+105%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−114%
120−130
+114%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
−108%
75−80
+108%
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55
−100%
100−105
+100%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−111%
80−85
+111%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
−108%
210−220
+108%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−106%
70−75
+106%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−114%
90−95
+114%
Valorant 55−60
−100%
110−120
+100%
World of Tanks 180−190
−91.3%
350−400
+91.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
−111%
95−100
+111%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−95.7%
45−50
+95.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−104%
55−60
+104%
Dota 2 50−55
−100%
100−105
+100%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−112%
110−120
+112%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−114%
120−130
+114%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
−108%
75−80
+108%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
−108%
210−220
+108%
Valorant 55−60
−100%
110−120
+100%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 20−22
−100%
40−45
+100%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
−100%
40−45
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
−116%
240−250
+116%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−100%
24−27
+100%
World of Tanks 95−100
−116%
210−220
+116%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−114%
60−65
+114%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−103%
65−70
+103%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−90.9%
21−24
+90.9%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−112%
70−75
+112%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−106%
70−75
+106%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
−114%
45−50
+114%
Metro Exodus 30−33
−117%
65−70
+117%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−94.4%
35−40
+94.4%
Valorant 30−35
−106%
70−75
+106%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−100%
18−20
+100%
Dota 2 24−27
−100%
50−55
+100%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
−108%
50−55
+108%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−100%
18−20
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
−107%
85−90
+107%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−100%
18−20
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−108%
50−55
+108%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−108%
27−30
+108%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−100%
18−20
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−100%
8−9
+100%
Dota 2 24−27
−100%
50−55
+100%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−106%
35−40
+106%
Fortnite 14−16
−100%
30−33
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−111%
40−45
+111%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
−110%
21−24
+110%
Valorant 14−16
−100%
30−33
+100%

This is how P2000 Max-Q and L4 compete in popular games:

  • L4 is 100% faster in 1080p
  • L4 is 105% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.81 29.97
Recency 5 July 2017 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm

L4 has a 117% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The L4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P2000 Max-Q in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P2000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation card while L4 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
NVIDIA L4
L4

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 15 votes

Rate Quadro P2000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 38 votes

Rate L4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.